Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Micro-CT¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ¸ÂÃãÇü CAD-CAM Áö´ëÁÖÀÇ ÀûÇÕ¼º ºÐ¼®

Fit analysis of CAD-CAM custom abutment using micro-CT

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Ã¶ÇÐȸÁö 2016³â 54±Ç 4È£ p.370 ~ 378
¹Î±¤¼®, Á¤ÀçÇå, ±èÈñÁß,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¹Î±¤¼® ( Min Gwang-Seok ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
Á¤ÀçÇå ( Chung Chae-Heon ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
±èÈñÁß ( Kim Hee-Jung ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç

Abstract

¸ñÀû: Biomet 3i ½Ã½ºÅÛ°ú Astra ½Ã½ºÅÛÀÇ ³»Ãø ¿¬°áÇü ÀÓÇöõÆ® °íÁ¤Ã¼¿¡ ±¹³»¿¡¼­ Á¦ÀÛµÈ ¸ÂÃãÇü CAD-CAM Áö´ëÁÖ¸¦ ü°áÇÏ¿© ±¸¼º ¼ººÐ °£ÀÇ ÀûÇÕ¼º°ú ³ª»çÀÇ ¾ÈÁ¤¼ºÀ» Æò°¡ÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

Àç·á ¹× ¹æ¹ý: 24°³ 3i ÀÓÇöõÆ® Áß 12°³ÀÇ ÀÓÇöõÆ®¿¡ ±â¼º Áö´ëÁÖ¸¦ ¿¬°áÇÏ°í, ³ª¸ÓÁö ÀÓÇöõÆ®¿¡´Â ¸ÂÃãÇü CAD-CAM Áö´ëÁÖ¸¦ ¿¬°áÇÏ¿© °¢°¢ Group 1°ú Group 2·Î ºÐ·ùÇÏ¿´´Ù. µ¿ÀÏ °³¼ö¿Í µ¿ÀÏÇÑ ¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î Astra ÀÓÇöõÆ®¸¦ °¢°¢ Group 3¿Í Group 4·Î ºÐ·ùÇÏ¿´´Ù. °¢°¢ÀÇ °íÁ¤Ã¼¿¡ Áö´ëÁÖ¸¦ ÀåÂøÇÏ¿© °¢ °è¸é »çÀÌÀÇ ÀûÇÕ¼ºÀ» micro-CT·Î °üÂûÇÏ°í Ãʱâ Ç®¸² ÅäÅ©¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÑ ÈÄ Æò°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á°ú: °íÁ¤Ã¼-Áö´ëÁÖÀÇ Á¢Ã˱æÀÌ´Â Group 1°ú Group 2 »çÀÌ »Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó Group 3¿Í Group 4 »çÀÌ¿¡µµ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù(Mann-Whitney test, P>.05). ÇÏÁö¸¸, Áö´ëÁÖ¿Í ³ª»çÀÇ °è¸é ¹× °íÁ¤Ã¼¿Í ³ª»çÀÇ °è¸é¿¡¼­ Group 2¿Í Group 4°¡ Group 1¿Í Group 3¿¡ ºñÇØ °¢±â ´õ Å« Á¢Ã˾ç»óÀ» º¸¿©ÁÖ¾ú´Ù(Mann-Whitney test, P<.05). ¶ÇÇÑ, Group 2¿Í Group 4°¡ Group 1°ú Group 3¿¡ ºñÇØ °¢±â ´õ ³·Àº ³ª»çÀÇ Ãʱâ Ç®¸² ÅäÅ©¸¦ ±â·ÏÇÏ¿´´Ù(Student t-test, P<.05).

°á·Ð: CAD-CAMÁö´ëÁÖ´Â ÀÓ»ó¿¡ Àû¿ëÇÒ ¸¸ÇÑ ÀûÇÕ¼ºÀ» Áö´Ï°í ÀÖÀ¸³ª, ±¤¹üÀ§ÇÑ ÀÓ»ó Àû¿ëÀ» À§Çؼ­´Â Ç®¸² ÅäÅ©°¡ Çâ»óµÇ¾î¾ß ÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù.

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to investigate screw joint stability and sagittal fit between internal connection implant fixtures of two different manufacturers and customized abutments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Internal connection implant systems from two different manufacturers (Biomet 3i system, Astra Tech system) were selected for this study (n=24 for each implant system, total n=48). For 3i implant system, half of the implants were connected with Ti ready-made abutments and the other half implants were connected with Ti CAD-CAM custom ones of domestic-make (Myplant, Raphabio Co., Seoul, Korea) and were classified into Group 1 and Group 2 respectively. Astra implants were divided into Group 3 and Group 4 in the same way. Micro-CT sagittal imaging was performed for fit analysis of interfaces and preloading reverse torque values (RTV) were measured.

RESULTS. In the contact length of fixture-abutment interface, there were no significant differences not only between Group 1 and Group 2 but also between Group 3 and Group 4 (Mann-Whitney test, P>.05). However, Group 2 and Group 4 showed higher contact length significantly than Group 1 and Group 3 in abutmentscrew interface as well as fixture-screw one (Mann-Whitney test, P<.05). In addition, RTV was lower in CAD-CAM custom abutments compared to ready-made ones (Student t-test, P<.05).

CONCLUSION. It is considered that domestically manufactured CAD-CAM custom abutments have similar fit at the fixture abutment interface and it could be used clinically. However, RTV of CAD-CAM custom abutments should be improved for the increase of clinical application.

Å°¿öµå

¸ÂÃãÇü CAD-CAM Áö´ëÁÖ; Micro-CT; ³»Ãø¿¬°áÇü ÀÓÇöõÆ® °íÁ¤Ã¼; Ãʱâ Ç®¸² ÅäÅ©; ³ª»ç ¾ÈÁ¤¼º
CAD-CAM custom abutment; Micro-CT; Internal connection implant fixture; Preloading reverse torque value; Screw joint stability

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed